Download Episode Here – right click link and select “Save Link As…”
In this podcast Joel and Antonia are joined by guest host Dr. Dario Nardi to talk about the 4 subtypes of each personality type.
————————————————
In this podcast you’ll find:
To subscribe to the podcast, please use the links below:
Subscribe with iTunes
Non-iTunes Link
Soundcloud
Stitcher
Google Play
Spotify
Radio Public
PlayerFM
Listen Notes
If you like the podcast and want to help us out in return, please leave an honest rating and review on iTunes by clicking here. It will help the show and its ranking in iTunes immensely! We would be eternally grateful!
Want to learn more?
Discover Your Personal Genius
We want to hear from you. Leave your comments below…
Share:
Personality Types And Trigger Warnings - Part 2 | Podcast 0453
Toxic Personality Traits (with Dr. Dario Nardi) | Podcast 0455
23 comments
Can you list some places where we can find more information in this? What a great episode that makes me say, “of course there have to be subtypes!” You’ve laid great foundation work and I want to know more. Thanks.
Assertivenes => Analytical
Harmonization => Holistic
got the terms mixed up while thinking about it. My bad ^^’
Thanks Joal, Antonia & Dario
I’ve read much of Dario’s online book and it is very interesting, though there are the usual limitations to this type of research, one of which is the skewed sample of people selected that is almost inevitable. It struck me for example that there was probably a lack of ‘neurotic’ or messed-up people in this data, which might explain why none of the INFP sub-types, with the possible exception of the ‘Dominant’ sub-type suggested any potential for neuroticism. I would have at least thought this was a possibility for the ‘Creative’ subtype – ‘tortured-artists’ for example, but instead they are depicted invariably as star-children-twinkly-pixies. I reckon there’ll be neurotic versions of pretty much all the sub-types actually.
I liked the description of ISTJ ‘creative’ but don’t really know what it had to do with combining ‘analytic’ Si with ‘holistic’ Te, based on the (brief) descriptions of those. Especially since the former was described, like both versions of Si, as ‘traditional’ – that appears to contradict the stated ‘rebel’ bent of creative sub-types.
Another thing I found difficult to get past was how all of the descriptions of the ‘2 favours of functions’ appeared to be based on their being in the dominant position. I’d say I related most to ‘holistic’ Fi, then ‘analytic’ Si, but not the ‘traditional’ bit except for being very nostalgic – I’d like to bring back some obsolete technology like electric typewriters. I actually related to ‘holistic’ Te more than either version of Ne, as described by Dario.
I am confident that the holistic and analytical are very much developed very early in life.
These 4 remind me of DISC types